A Teachable Moment

PCT President Morty Rosenfeld periodically attempts to make sense of the increasingly senseless world of public education.

Taking a Risk for Justice

A couple of days ago, at a union meeting of leaders from adjacent school districts, I listened to Jeanette Deutermann, the leader of the Long Island Opt-Out movement, parents who will not allow their kids to be subjected to New York’s obsessive testing. Deutermann spoke eloquently of how the upsetting experience of her child during the state exams led her to start asking questions about them, the answers to which were deeply disturbing. She shared her concerns with some friends, tied into what opt-out movements in other states were doing, and the Long Island movement was born.
Deutermann is clearly looking for a way to work with teachers. She doesn’t want to get them in trouble, but she knows that it is only through a close alliance of parents and teachers that the powers in Albany will be more fearful of an enraged public than the corporate leaders sponsoring the current testing regime as a tool to discredit public schools.

In response to Deutermann’s remarks, I spoke about the need for teacher unions to support the Opt-Out movement if we are to maintain our credibility with our parent communities. At the very least, I maintained, we ought to be encouraging our own members to opt their kids out of a testing regime that we often claim is tantamount to child abuse. Addressing the concerns of several leaders that there were risks associated with defying the education department both for individuals and school districts, I tried to bring my colleagues back to their roots.

I observed that the brave souls who started our teacher union movement took far greater risks than I was talking about. That, for example, the brave teachers who undertook the first strike on Long Island did so with a law on the books that permitted the state to terminate them for striking. However, they knew what all who strive for social justice know – that there is always risk in confronting injustice, but the risk of tolerating it is greater. Those who take the battle on are not fearless. They get scared, but they do what they have to anyway.

I don’t know if I convinced anyone. I do know I’m sick and tired of union meetings where leaders find an assortment of excuses to avoid taking action. Too many of our unions have adopted a service model instead of an organizing one, the one that brought us from what was essentially serfdom to economic security. I know too that if we rise up and use our numbers to unite with pro-public education citizens and confront the privatizers, the testocrats and the plain stupid, we can save public education and our profession.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Gates and Our Union

Some of my colleagues were upset by Diane Ravitch’s blog post for yesterday from which they learned that last year our state union accepted a grant from the Gates Foundation to its Education and Learning trust of $500,000. I’m happy for their surprise. I’m even happier for their anger! I hope they channel their anger into action.

While I didn’t know of this, even though I’m a member of the NYSUT Board of Directors, I’m not in any way shocked by this news. That the NEA and AFT have both been altogether too cozy with Gates has been clear for years. Why would anyone be surprised that the AFT’s largest state affiliate would try to translate that coziness into dollars? Where was the outrage two AFT conventions ago when the featured speaker was none other than Bill Gates talking about teacher accountability and how to measure it? Very few people walked out of the hall with me. Our leaders encouraged us to be polite to the man who has done more to discredit teachers and public education than anyone I can think of. Our leaders believed for a time that a seat at Bill Gates’ table would enable us to influence the policy of his foundation, ameliorating the negative influence of his money on our profession. I believe they have started to learn otherwise. We can see them changing course. Their policies haven’t worked. Our members are increasingly demanding action. They are starting to get it.

Both AFT and NEA have gotten considerably more aggressive in the anti-testing campaign. While they can’t yet bring themselves to openly support the Opt-Out movement, it’s beginning to lo0k as though they will have to if we are to maintain any credibility with parents of the children we serve. When AFT President Randi Weingarten calls for a moratorium on “the consequences” of the Common Core Standards because of the slipshod way in which they are being implemented, she surely knows that call will go unheeded and that the only next step open to us will be to join the growing public movement against the Common Core. Both organizations are making serious efforts to get away from service oriented unionism and back to their organizing roots. Witness the call of New York’s leaders for a mass demonstration in Albany on June 8 to demand a sane testing regime and adequate funding of our schools. Better yet, witness the organizing work being done at the local level to make this day a huge success.
So, colleagues, be angry. Let your anger move us to action. Let’s get organized. Let’s start taking some risks to defend public education. We’re going to have to do more than vote and write letters to save the institution we love.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Gates Is At It Again

In a show soon to air on PBS, Bill Gates is said to be going to air his latest teacher improvement plan. Taking a step back from student test scores as a measure of teacher quality, he is now proposing that the country spend 5 billion dollars to put a camera in every classroom so that God knows who can watch and evaluate teachers’ performance. It can’t be long before some data driven dunce comes up with a scale that gives principals 25% of the teacher score, parents 25%, students 25% and taxpayers in the community another 25%.

There are literally countless people working in America’s public schools who know infinitely more about educating children and judging the quality of teaching than Bill Gates. We almost never get to hear them. In America today, the value of an idea is directly proportional to the money behind it.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

A Dirty Little Secret

The dirty little secret in the debate about the role of testing in our public schools is that the more we rely on tests to evaluate teachers, the more truly ineffective teachers we will have in our nation’s classrooms. That’s because the easiest teaching there is to do is teaching to a test. It requires very limited knowledge and even less imagination. Get the students convinced that the “must” pass the test, and by and large they will accept the drill and kill that is becoming increasingly standard fare. It’s probably even true that we could get very similar test results with high tech devices and a security guard watch over the students as they follow endless links on the road to mastery scores on their tests.

In the old Soviet Union there was a joke among workers that went, “The government pretends to pay us, and we pretend to work.” In the education world of the testocracy, we will increasingly pretend to teach, and our students will pretend to learn. After a brief period, nobody will even know we are pretending.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Sunday Morning Talk

he Sunday morning talk shows are a highlight of my week. A pile of fresh bagels, an assortment of smoked fish, lots of coffee and politics. What could be better? Watch a few. Record a few. The whole day accounted for, especially when there is no baseball to watch.

But on ABC’s This Week, Michelle Rhee hawking her new book disturbed my morning as not even war reports can. Here was this media-made expert again being given attention as though she accomplished something important and actually knows something about public schools. It’s maddening to see the deference she receives, even though there is a growing body of evidence that her accomplishments as head of the D.C. schools is also a largely media concocted story. Confronted by George Stephanopoulos with the fact that there is growing public opposition to the standardized testing that she has championed, this master media manipulator began to back away from her staunch advocacy of testing, sensing that that her economic future may depend on public popularity. Sounding very much like national union leadership, Rhee thinks that we need a balanced testing regime, although exactly what balanced means to people like her she has yet to say. The most infuriating part of the interview was when Stephanopoulos as her what she had learned from her D.C. experience, and Rhee, a wide toothy smile on her face, said that she probably shouldn’t have fired a fired a D.C. principal on TV. I guess for her that passes for moral growth.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Will Seattle Be the Spark?

I’ve written many times that the only way many of the so-called education reforms that are destroying our good schools are going to be defeated is through the civil disobedience of educators and parents. Parents have been in the vanguard of fighting the plague of high stakes testing. Growing numbers of them are keeping their kids home on the days that the tests are administered. Today the first teachers joined the battle. The teachers at Garfield High School in Seattle have announced their refusal to administer the state tests that are used to evaluate instructors. Their press release is contained in this blog post I found. The writer calls upon teachers and their unions to support these courageous teachers. I couldn’t agree more. I’ve written the following to them:

The members of the Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers support your efforts to end the scourge of high stakes testing that is destroying public education in the United States. We hope that your courage sparks teachers and their unions throughout the country to defend their profession from the data driven drones who seek to measure us out of existence.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Kids Thinking of Gaming the System

While I was thinking of what I would write about today, I got an email from a colleague who reported a conversation he overheard between among a group of sixth grade middle school students in our district.

“It’s very easy, if you don’t like your teacher, just fail the second test on purpose, and the teacher will get in trouble.”

What the kids were clearly talking about is the pretest teachers of many subjects were forced to give at the beginning of the school year to set a baseline against which to judge the academic growth of their student in June. So, add to the list of stupidities inherent in the new teacher evaluation system the gaming of the system itself by eleven year olds.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Thinking About Chicago

The focus of the media in the aftermath of the Chicago teacher strike appears to largely be on the new evaluation process partially tying teacher salaries to state examinations. While none of the mainstream press appears to have the details of the agreed to evaluation plan, and while some of it at least remains to be worked out, the public is told that this will bring some significant benefit to the students of the Chicago public schools. It will bring nothing to the students. It will bring anxiety and bitterness to the teachers. Fine teachers will have their reputations tarnished, while bad ones will be deemed highly effective. Politicians like Rahm Emanuel will smugly posture, spouting bloviated bull about how they had the balls to take on the teachers’ union. The kids in the Chicago schools will still be sitting in huge classes without the support services that just might help them overcome the handicaps poverty has imposed on many of them. When, as it surely will be, this teacher evaluation canard is exposed, those who long for the demise of public education will point to this evaluation fiasco as proof that nothing good can come from public schools.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Guidance?

For those who believe Governor Cuomo’s bull about teacher unions dragging their heels at negotiating agreements on the new Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) legislation, follow this link to the latest in a seemingly endless series of guidance documents from the New York State Education Department. Can a procedure for the evaluation of teachers that takes 92 pages of opaque prose to explain possibly improve the education of a single child in our state? And what reason is there to believe that there won’t be other guidance documents forthcoming that will change what we think we understand about the rules today? As an administrator in my district quipped the other day, “We’re waiting for the guidance document on guidance documents.” Fortunes of money have and will be spent on this nonsense. Thousands and thousands of hours have been spent by teachers and administrators working on developing plans. Children will be increasingly subjected to more state tests, and not a single child will be helped by the process because it doesn’t address any of the problems faced by our public schools. It is we who should be providing guidance to the no-nothings in Albany. My suggestion? Leave now. The careers of the folks in Albany are bound to be ruined when these plans are fully implemented and the stupidity of this endeavor becomes broadly apparent.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Public Humiliation

The release in New York City of the ratings of teachers on the basis of their students’ performance on standardized tests, data which is know to be highly flawed, is a new low for the scumbags who believe that we can improve our public schools by shaming our teachers into doing a better job. When Bill Gates and Chancellor Meryl Tisch, two committed leaders of the testocracy, are alarmed by this event, even the diehards ought to pause. In predictable fashion, the New York Times, which litigated to obtain teacher scores, has started to showcase higher scoring teachers, giving them a dubiously deserved celebrity which will inevitably isolate them in their schools and, much worse, create the impression that the other teachers in the school are undesirable. It’s enough to make one puke. The only hopeful note is a report suggesting that city teachers have had enough and are ready to fight. We could well use their leadership in that direction! If the public humiliation of teachers doesn’t cause a militant response, there will be no hope lest for the education labor movement.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have Comment (1)

And the Stupidity Unfolds

Sunday’s New York Times featured a front page article entitled “States Try to Fix Quirks in Teacher Evaluations” that is remarkable for its ironic understatement of the problems inherent in the new teacher evaluation protocols spreading flu-like across the country. The article opens with a Nashville principal perplexed at having emerged from watching what he understood to be a very good literature lesson but knowing that the rubric he is expected to use to evaluate the teacher’s performance will render his official report of the lesson less than very good. He will be forced to give parts of it the lowest possible score for what he knows to be foolish reasons. This is one of the “quirks” that some states are looking to fix, we are told.

It’s much more than “quirks” in the evaluation procedure that is at the heart of the principal’s problem. Assuming that he knows what he is talking about and that the lesson was to his experienced eye very good, what sort of lunacy is it to oblige him to suspend his professional judgment and mindlessly apply a rubric that assigns values to parts of a teacher’s lesson and loses track of the effect of the whole in the process? No, it’s not a quirk in the rubric driven evaluations that need fixing. It’s the entire concept that renders both teacher and principal slaves to an essentially arbitrary model of what a lesson should be, a model that degrades the craft of teaching. How long do we think it will take for students to figure out the rubric from experiencing lessons of the same shape period after period, day after day? “Here comes the group work,” I can hear them saying now.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have Comment (1)

Narrower and Narrower

Although the new mandated teacher evaluation system that rates teachers in part on the performance of their students on state assessments is not yet in place on our district, its impact is already permeating the thoughts of teachers. Predictably, teachers are increasingly on guard to factors that might in any way depress their students’ scores and thereby compromise their evaluations. At a meeting I attended yesterday, a discussion that began about the inadequate budget for field trips quickly turned when a teacher made the following statement. “If my students’ test scores are to be a part of my evaluation, I’m going to fight all of you who keep taking kids out of my class to go on field trips. I’m not against field trips, but if they are going to cause my students to miss instruction and get lower scores on the Regents, then those trips could have a negative impact on me.” While I could lament the further narrowing of the curriculum taking place before my eyes, I realized that teachers will have to adjust what they do to protect their employment, as sad as that may be. They would have to be insane not to.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Meaningful Education Data

Let’s see if all of the data driven dunces who think they can fix public education by using student test scores to lop off the bottom ten percent of teachers each year can come to grips with the data from several studies reported today in the New York Times. Big surprise – the school performance of poor children has been falling behind that of their wealthier peers, and these studies haven’t as yet measured the fully effect of what we are euphemistically calling the Great Recession. Watch for the response from social Darwinists like Charles Murray to caution us against thinking that the lack of money and resources has anything to do with the performance of poor children. Surely it’s the inferiority, both genetically and culturally, of the poor that is largely responsible. Others on the right will surely continue to maintain that great teachers can solve this problem. One thing I know for sure – most of our politicians will not call for measures to overcome the poverty of some many of our nation’s children. Shame on all of us.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Drive-by What?

In recent weeks I’ve been to a number of union meetings of my state and national unions. Common to too many of the leaders present at all these meetings was a very unfortunate characterization of the evaluation of teachers prior to the recent accountability rage as “drive-by observations.” If these evaluations have been that meaningless, why is it that almost every teacher I’ve known in over forty years in public education anguishes in anticipation of being observed and takes deeply to heart every negative word in the final written document? Why is it that those observation reports that I get to read often go on for pages, documenting and criticizing almost every move the teacher made during the lesson being observed?

To suggest as some union leaders do that teachers have not been held accountable for their performance until now is to betray the people they are elected to represent. They give aid and comfort to the enemies of public education and to all of those who work in public schools. Such thoughtless, reformist positions alienate members from union leadership and weaken our ability to defend ourselves. It is essentially spreading some of the right-wing’s propaganda about us. Certainly no teacher I know believes she has not been accountable for her performance.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Mutual Accountability

While we are assaulted daily with new ideas to make teacher accountability more rigorous, we don’t hear much about measuring the performance of John King, our Commissioner of Education, Meryl Tisch, our Chancellor or the Board of Regents. We have an accountability system for our state’s lobbyist for children, Governor Cuomo. His performance will be measured at the polls.

We need a rubric to measure the performance of these people who determine education policy and its implementation. We and the public need to know whether they are Highly Effective, Effective, Developing or Ineffective, just as we rate teachers according to these categories. Surely teachers and the public would like to know if our commissioner, chancellor and regents are 85% performers or 63%. While we’re at it, it’s time to do something about the way school superintendents are evaluated. Just as “drive-by observations” of teachers will no longer do, we need something more rigorous than yearly meetings of boards of education where superintendents are more often judges on their abilities to keep their boards happy than on any real accomplishments. Too many 63% teachers? Maybe the superintendent is a 55.

I’d be interested in hearing from readers as to what they think this system of mutual accountability would look like.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments