A Teachable Moment

PCT President Morty Rosenfeld periodically attempts to make sense of the increasingly senseless world of public education.

Jeanette Deutermann

Diane Ravitch’s blog today carries a thank you from Jeanette Deutermann, the indefatigable founder of the Long Island Opt –Out movement, its Norma Rae if you will. No one in the state of New York has done more to organize, and I mean organize, opposition to the scourge of high stakes testing. No one has even approached her commitment to protecting children from the demonstrable harmful effects testing has had on children and the educational program they receive. I’ve been proud to know her and work with her. At a time in our history when skillful leaders are hard to come by, Jeanette has kept the secret of leadership alive. She knows what so few of the so-called leaders I know do – that all people want power; they just don’t know how to get it. If you show them how to get some power and believe in their ability to achieve it, they will follow your lead and causes once thought hopeless become possible. So, as those of us who have been active in the Opt-Out movement enjoy our great victory, let’s pause and recognize our debt of gratitude to the person without whom this day might well not have arrived.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

A Modest Proposal

Our state math assessments begin today. As I write the opt out numbers are coming in predictably a bit ahead of the English numbers last week. This is also the week that the New York State legislature resumes it work. Legislators are going back to Albany having heard an earful from the people at home about their recent vote to double down on testing as part of the teacher evaluation process. They also go back knowing that an enraged public withheld their children from the tests at a rate of at least three times that of last year. Should this movement continue to grow, as it shows every sign of doing, within a year or so there won’t be any children taking the state examinations. Some of the legislators are openly talking of doing something to fix the problem they and the governor created. They are clearly beginning to see that the organizing skills of the people who invented and grew the opt out movement can clearly be put to use election time to hammer those who put obedience to Andrew Cuomo and the corporate backers of so-called education reform above the interests of the parents, children and teachers in their districts.

The easiest fix would be to go back to what we have been doing until a more sensible approach to teacher evaluation can be developed. Better yet would be to pass a law that breaks the unsupportable connection between student standardized tests results and teacher competence. Still better is a modified version of something I used to do at grading time for my students that just might be a simple approach to teacher evaluation. Before I gave out quarterly grades I made students write down for me what they thought they had eared for the quarter. Almost invariably, the students gave themselves lower grades that I did. I strongly suspect that given the same assignment to critique their performance for the school year, teachers would overwhelmingly point to more shortcomings than those paid to supervise them would have seen. In such a system, we would probably have fewer highly effective teachers, the governor would have accomplished his mission and nothing of any consequence would have changed for anybody. Why go through all of the political contortions, the endless educationist drivel, the countless hours of testing and test prep when deep down we all know that none of this nonsense makes the slightest difference to the education of a single child in our schools. We can count on the low self-esteem of teachers to underrate their performance and to always believe that they could have done better.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Sorry NYT – It Is a Parent Led Movement

This morning’s New York Times offers the latest example of the pathetically poor coverage of the opt-out movement and the role of teacher unions in it. The current narrative has it that the unions are the principal motivators of the movement and the parents of the children opting out almost the dupes of the union bosses who have come to see opposition to testing as their weapon to defend from the bipartisan assault on public education. My experiences as a union leader at both the local and state levels in New York tell a different story and make wonder and confirm my suspicions that the mainstream media are at best handmaidens to the corporate education reform movement in our state.

Let’s be clear; while I and other local union leaders welcome NYSUT to the opt out cause they are newbies to the movement. In fact, they’re even pretty new to the anti-testing movement. As a former member of the NYSUT Board of Directors I recall with considerable chagrin the obdurate refusal of the union’s previous leadership under Dick Iannuzzi to embrace the anti-testing movement. I vividly remember an exchange between Dick Iannuzzi in which he answered my call to squarely oppose high stakes testing and the Common Core State Standards and join forces with the growing opt-out movement with, “We disagree. I don’t think parents want to do away with testing. What they want are better tests.” Let’s remember too that it was Iannuzzi’s team that negotiated the current APPR agreement with Governor Cuomo, an agreement which acknowledged that student scores on high stakes tests were an appropriate measure of student performance. By the time Iannuzzi realized the growing power of the anti-test/opt out movement and began to quietly cooperate with it, that movement was already launched with a dynamic leadership all its own. Here on Long Island, Long Island Opt Out led the way with a leader in Jeanette Deutermann who knows more about organizing than most of the union leaders I know. In part, his failure to read the political tea leaves on the testing/ opt –out issue would cost him the presidency of NYSUT.

Even in the early days of the Magee administration, while she and our national union affiliates gradually began to speak more critically of what testing was doing to public education and while some locals had upped their profiles and publically supported the opt-out movement, there still was not clear policy decision taken to frontally assault the testocracy by promoting refusal of the examinations. It was literally only weeks ago that Karen Magee in an interview said that if she had school age children, she would opt them out of the impending exams. That remark and stronger ones to follow came only after the governor and the leaders of both parties in the legislature conspired to screw that state’s teachers.

What early union support there was for the opt-out movement existed here and there at the local level. The fact is that most locals were even reluctant to tell their own members to opt their children out, repeatedly seeking guidance from NYSUT, only to get equivocation.

No, the opt out movement has been an essentially parent driven movement, aided in some places by local teacher unions, but completely independent of them, so much so that at times there was some friction between our supporting locals on Long Island at the parent leadership of the movement. While I’m very glad that NYSUT has come around to a full-throated support of opting-out, they are walking on a path that others have blazed before them. If I had had my way, the critique offered by the New York Times would have been true. It didn’t work out that way, however.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Screens and Self-Esteem?

The educrats and Board of education members I engage think of me, I’m sure , as a 21st century Luddite for my often acerbic criticism of what I see as their thoughtless support for the infusion of technology into our schools. While I’m as fascinated by technology as most and have used it to good effect in my union work, I’m nevertheless aware of a growing concern among many serious scholars about the effects of screen viewing on the developing brains of children, a development that continues into a person’s twenties. I’m frankly appalled by the almost total lack of concern expressed by these leaders. I’ve sent many of them links to peer reviewed articles by neuro-scientists. I once even bought a copy of a well- received book on the effects of screen gazing on the academic skills of college students, only to find that only one out of the seven had the fortitude or the ability to read it. While I know techno-hucksters have won the battle, I still can’t give up, reminders constantly coming my way of why we need a more serious discussion of the role of technology in education than we have had to date.

I had dinner the other night with a young history professor who talked about how many of her colleagues have banned electronic devices in their classrooms. While she uses technology in what she is sure are beneficial ways, and while she is aware that some students find it more efficient to take their notes on the laptops they bring to class, she has had the experience of walking around the classroom as she is talking only to find students engrossed in social media and even less wholesome endeavors. She is sorely tempted to bar these distractions from her classes.

Sunday brought an article in the New York Times about research suggestions yet to be confirmed that substantial screen watching impairs children’s ability to read the body language of others and their development of self-esteem. While not dispositive, it somehow doesn’t surprise me that there may be a connection between a child being glued to her smart phone and a diminished capacity to make eye contact with others. More and more the technology infusers have almost a religious zeal about them that question asking doubters like me find deeply disturbing.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

We Won’t Be Divided And Conquered

With Long Island remaining the hub of the state’s opt-out movement (As of this writing 71,496 refusals have been reported.), it’s not surprising that one of our local politicians has nervously introduced legislation clearly aimed at mollifying the anti-testing electorate in in his district. Senator Jack Martins has introduced a bill that would exempt 20 percent of the state’s highest performing districts from the newly adopted Annual Professional Performance Review measures adopted by Albany.

While his legislation has a surface appeal to those who live and work in school districts that are some of the best in our nation and as good as most in the world, a little thought reveals the ethical absurdity of the proposal. We know beyond doubt that high test scores correlate with family income. Parents of rich kids can and do provide them with opportunities ranging from the obvious to the more subtle and immeasurable that get reflected on standardized tests from the third grade ELA test to the SAT. That said, are we then to increase the stakes on examinations for the economically and socially disadvantaged, judging their teachers by a dubious standard while those from more affluent and advantaged communities are exempt? Does such a move make any sense other than as an obvious attempt to quiet the opt-out movement by state politicians who grow increasingly fearful that their support for the new teacher evaluation system could seriously jeopardize their chances for re-election?

Suggestions like this one from Senator Martins should serve to heighten our determination to see to it that we are better represented in Albany by people whose motivations are deeper than political expediency. Senator Martins and those who voted with him to double down on testing had a chance to stand up for public education and the quality schools in his district. He muffed to opportunity to stand for something worthwhile. Our movement to end the scourge of high stake stesting has an ethical depth that people like him simply can’t understand. We won’t be divided and conquered.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

No Time To Be Nice

The opt out numbers look better and better. As of this writing, over 68,000 Long Island students refused to take the grade 3 through 8 examinations. That’s more refusals than there were in the entire state of New York last year. In no uncertain terms, these numbers are the response of a public who petitioned their elected representatives to do something to end the scourge of high stakes test in our state only to have to resort to civil disobedience when those representatives failed to do their job. I believe we need to keep the pressure on those who have been nothing less than duplicitous, telling us in various public forums that they supported our efforts to curb an out of control testing regime that was turning our best schools into essentially test prep institutions, only to in the end give the governor almost more than he asked for.

That being my view, it’s alarming to begin to hear NYSUT, our state education union, counseling being nice to these elected leaders who have betrayed us and the institution of public education. I don’t want to be nice to Assemblyman Charles Lavine. I want to support a candidate to primary him. If that fails, I want to run a Green Party candidate against him. Ditto with Senators Hannon and Marcellino who have grown far too comfortable and who seem to feel we will forgive them anything because that got us a little extra money for our schools. It is beyond question that by and large our elected leaders have no respect for us. Accepting bad treatment in my experience leads only to more bad treatment. I don’t understand why our union leaders in Albany don’t understand that. It’s really just that simple.

Many of us have worked very hard to build coalitions to oppose the attack on public education and the high stakes testing central to it. These groups are flush with our opt out victory and need to now be steered to politically removing the people who have shown themselves to be our enemies. This union leader is not going to be a party to letting people who openly screwed us off the hook.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Don’t Confuse Talk With Action

Monday night’s meeting of the Plainview-Old Bethpage Board of Education was the first since the passage of the law which effectively made student results on state assessments the most important piece of teachers’ evaluations. Teachers whose students fail to reach an essentially arbitrary growth targets cannot be rated effective, even if those who supervise them on a daily basis rate understand them to be effective or better. What that does is to tie teachers’ continued employment to student test results. Does anyone doubt that teachers will be hyper-focused on preparing their students for the state tests? To not do so is to be irresponsible to themselves and their families. With that understanding of what New York had done to teachers and public education, I listened in amazement to Superintendent Lorna Lewis explain to the public how despite the action of the legislature and the governor, our schools would not yield and become focused on test preparation. What a canard!

First of all, we have already become a district that moves to the substance and rhythm of the state Common Core assessments, even though they have until now counted for only twenty percent of a teacher’s evaluation. With the new law wherein test results trump the observation of supervisors, one would have to be delusional not to understand that teachers will be driven to focus on preparing children for tests that are determinative teachers’ ability to continue to have their careers. Why, I wonder, would we lead the public to believe otherwise, a public half of whom opted their kids out of the assessments in protest against what they are doing to the academic program in our schools?

The leaders of our district like many seem to confuse talk with action. They are against testing, yet they don’t publically support the opt-out movement, have increasingly worked routinize instruction, focusing on the alignment of the educational program with the very assessment they claim to oppose. Just yesterday, I was told that teachers have been instructed to give final examinations in 5th and 6th grades, no one ever bothering to ask teacher whether that is an appropriate thing to do. More and more we’re preoccupied with making children college and career ready without ever understanding that we are squeezing out of the program many of the very things that actually contribute to that readiness. If the expression college and career ready means anything it implies the growth and development of a human child which surely includes much more than what is measured on an English or math test. Our leaders would have us understand that all is well in our schools. Nothing could be further from the truth. The parents who refused to let their kids take the state exams know this, and they are growing in numbers. They are the hope that we can bring real education back to our schools. If we double the number of children opting out again next year, there will be no one taking the tests. We could get to that happy day much faster if all our school leaders would act like the scourge of high stakes testing is the real threat that it is.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

THE ANSWER IS OPT OUT

Yesterday I posed the question of whether parents would opt their children out of the state exams or acquiesce to the demands of a corporate school reform movement bent on destroying public education in our nation. I’m heartened to report that almost half of the parents in my community (48.2%) have said enough. They don’t care what Governor Cuomo thinks. They will not allow Chancellor Tisch and the State Ed department poison the educational climate of their schools with more and more of their programs dictated by the demands of tests that do absolutely nothing to improve instruction anywhere in our state. I strongly suspect that those numbers will grow over this testing season, as parents who felt a little uncomfortable bucking the dictates of the state see that over one thousand others put their qualms behind them.

This has been a very hopeful day. The growing numbers of citizens who care about public education who deeply understand the threat posed to it encourages me to believe that we can win the battle in the end. We more than doubled our opt out numbers this year. If we have to, we will do that again next year which would bring us to the point where almost no students are taking the exams. At that point, the testocracy melts into an ugly puddle of slime.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

OPT-OUT OR ACQUIESCE

Tomorrow the New York State 3 through 8 assessments begin. While Governor Cuomo and the legislature effectively more than doubled down on high stakes testing, there is a good chance that, in the best American tradition, citizens will cast their own vote on the testing epidemic by opting their children out of the exams. Exams that children don’t take cannot be used against them and their teachers.

Last year, over sixty thousand New York children were withheld by their parents from the assessments, over twenty thousand on Long Island. This year the numbers are bound to be significantly higher. The only question is how much higher.

It is not hyperbole to suggest that either parents will rise up and voice a resounding NO to what the testocracy is doing to public education, or they will acquiesce to the corporate powers behind the testing movement and thereby move the process of dismantling public education forward significantly.

Coincidentally, I just sent in the second half of my school taxes for the year. For the first time in my adult, I felt a pang of resentment for having to pay to support what to my mind is the daily debasing of education in our schools, as testing drives more and more of the curriculum and the notion of what it means to be educated evaporates in favor of what at best is job training.

My generation took to civil disobedience to promote the rights of all Americans to participate in our democracy. We took to the streets to stop a stupid war in Viet Nam in which thousands of my peers died for no discernible reason. Those were moral crusades, and I believe the movement to prevent the corporate takeover of public education is every bit as much of a moral issue. If we care about educating our children to be thoughtful, analytical participants of our democracy, people with a broad understanding of all that makes us human, then it seems to me we will thwart this latest attack on public education by refusing to have our children participate in the main weapon intended to destroy it – high stakes testing.
Should the opt-out movement fail, it will signal to those who lust to turn our schools into profit centers that they are on the right course and that the public doesn’t care enough to protest its schools.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Hard to Believe Tisch

Merryl Tisch is quoted this morning as saying that high performing districts (not defined) should be exempt from the new and as yet to be State Ed crafted annual professional performance review. I strongly suspect that the statement is intended to quell the growing opt out movement whose leaders tend to come from these very districts, Let’s remember that when the Governor’s Director of Operations wrote to Tisch seeing her input needed legislation, she responded with almost exactly what came out of the recently enacted legislation. Would such a move make sense? Sure it would, and that’s why I don’t expect it to happen. It would be hard to find a less sensible institution than our State Ed Department. Everything they turn out is at best opaque.

I’ll be taking this holiday season off, trying to recover from recent depressing events and restore my energy for the battles ahead. I’ll be back on April 13. Be sure to look for me.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Opting-Out: More Important Than Ever

Parents who have been undecided about opting their children out of the New York State assessments have been given good reason to decide to refuse the tests. The distortion of teaching and learning of the current teacher evaluation system has now been magnified five- fold – by a change in the law that says that no teacher can be rated effective or highly effective if her student scores don’t meet some number to be determined by the State Ed Department. That effectively makes the test 100 percent of a teacher’s evaluation.

This betrayal by our elected leaders has got to be answered and answered immediately. The best means at had to do so is to drive the opt-out numbers through the roof. Teacher who have children in grades 3 through 8 who don’t opt them out are aiding and abetting the demise of their profession and prejudicing their employment. It’s just that simple.

Parents who want more from their schools than training in how to pass standardized tests must inform the schools their children attend that they refuse to permit their children to take the state tests. These tests have never had any educational value. They have now become a very significant impediment to anything enlightened people would deem an appropriate education. With these exams determining their future employment, teachers will have no choice but to teach to them. Thus, a curriculum already significantly narrowed by corporate sponsored reform will have more squeezed out of it leaving little but English and math. The bottom line is if no one takes the tests, they can’t be used negatively impact teachers and students.

The Governor and Legislature know full well that they have spit in the eyes of New Yorkers. They know what they have done is dreadfully unpopular. Two recent polls showed the public overwhelmingly supporting the teachers union over their elected leaders. Our leaders have calculated that we will forget what they have done to our schools. Opting out must be our immediate message that we will never forget. We must also begin immediately to work to challenge those who have represented other interests, not ours. Our local will be reaching out to our community searching for candidates to challenge Senators Hannon and Marcellino and our Assemblyman Charles Lavine, all of whom have claimed to be friends of public education but who abandoned us when we needed them most.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Bargain With The Devil

Details in the Albany press this morning reveal a budget deal even worse than it originally appeared. Governor Cuomo sought to have the results of state assessments count fifty percent toward a teacher’s yearly evaluation. What the deal provides is that for some teachers the state tests will count one hundred percent.

Governor Cuomo’s office is saying that the deal establishes teacher evaluation criteria such that if student scores show a teacher to be “ineffective,” that teacher cannot be rated effective even if her observation results say she is highly effective. To my mind that’s one hundred percent of a teacher’s evaluation, and an unmitigated outrage. In the short time that we have had a system tying student score to teacher evaluations, I have seen some of our very best teachers get student test results that would have rated them ineffective or developing but for their outstanding performance as measured by observation and supervision. Although there is ample scientific evidence that the state assessments are unreliable indicators of teacher performance, with a high degree of likelihood that today’s highly effective teacher is next year’s ineffective one, the elected leaders of our state have apparently decided that science be damned, settling political scores with our state union is more important the professional lives of hard working teachers and their students.

If the deal as we understand it today is what is put into effect in November, teachers will be consumed by the need to have their students score high enough to get them rated effective. We will have taken a giant step towards the extinction of what we have known as teaching and education. What will remain for teachers to do will be to monitor student participation in digitized media test prep, which through engaging graphics and other facets of computer gaming will convince the ignorant that something called twenty-first century education has come at last. Those who are able to see through that digitized illusion will almost be like the book-people in Fahrenheit 451, keeping learning and education alive until such time as there is a period of enlightenment when the keepers of knowledge and learning are again respected and allowed to share their gifts with the young.

This bargain with the devil will apparently be voted on by the Legislature today. We need to study the vote and start the very next day to oppose those cowardly cretins who supported it. The Long Island delegation likes to think of itself as made up of strong supporters of public education. Those who vote for this deal have given up any right to that title.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Legislators Flail About Looking for Political Solution

The teacher evaluation plan in place in Plainview-Old Bethpage took us about a year and a half to negotiate. While I would be the first to say that the time could have been much better spent, there is one sense in which our APPR (Annual Professional Performance Review) has been an improvement over the way evaluations were done prior to its advent, although that improvement has nothing to do with the student test score part of the plan.

The introduction of a rubric to guide the observation process has taken what had tended to be amorphous written observations, often simply an endless series of clichés, and introduced more concrete language about discernible aspects of a teacher’s performance. The observations that I get to read these days are much better focused and anchored specific references rather the generalized blather I used to read. Today I usually know immediately what the observer was talking about, something that heretofore was often difficult to know. There is now at least the potential that the process provided teachers with feedback that challenges them to think about what they are doing.

It’s ironic then that one of the few real gains from all the effort that went into negotiating these APPR plans is being challenged by Governor Cuomo who wants to put increased emphasis on student test results. As I write this, yet a new proposal is circulating in the legislature that would have the Regents come up with changes to the teacher evaluation process. To me, that’s one of the scariest ideas yet.

No one in authority is talking about any plan that will have any significant effect. If we were serious about teacher evaluation instead, of looking for excuses to not have to deal with the staggering number of New York’s children who live in impoverished families, we would be looking to an approach that had practicing teachers deeply involved in the process. We would look to organize schools in ways that would make teachers the most important people in the building, empowered to make professional decisions like who gets tenure. Can anyone imagine Merryl Tisch suggesting that to the Regents? It’s seriously disheartening to watch our elected officials flailing about in search of a political solution to a problem that doesn’t really exist.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Tenure Envy

Tenure envy is at the heart over the ongoing debate about the due process rights of teachers. With the number of union workplaces in a steep decline for decades, the concept of not being subject to the whim of one’s employer is essentially foreign to a generation of American workers. They are therefore envious of one of the remaining groups to have protection from arbitrary dismissal. Disreputable politicians like Governor Cuomo play to this envy for cheap political gain.

Envy is a funny emotion. It can motivate people to seek to acquire the object of their desire, or it can curiously move people to seek satisfaction by trying to see to it that no one has it. The latter seems to explain the public view of tenure.

If we asked people who want tenure abolished if they believe that employers should be able to arbitrarily fire any of their employees, I strongly suspect most would say no. Most people have a native sense of fairness and know that it is all-together common for people to be fired for a variety of reasons that have nothing to do with the quality of their work. Their vulnerability to the whim of their employers causes them to see it as unfair that other are protected against such arbitrariness. If they are unprotected, why should anyone else be? There must be something wrong. These teachers must have rigged the system in some way to provide them with what most others lack.

In a more unionized country, people would be more familiar with the due process rights in many labor contracts. More people would understand that all workers should be protected from arbitrary dismissal, that wrongly firing people can have a profound impact on their lives and the lives of their families. Taking away a person’s job should be based on evidence that is evaluated by an independent party. That’s all tenure is. It’s not a guarantee of lifetime employment. It’s simply a mechanism to make sure that people don’t lose their employment without good reason. In the end it is a mechanism to provide justice, something that all workers should be afforded.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Hillary’s Dilemma

Back in February, I wrote about what educators would want to hear from Hillary Clinton about public education once she announces her candidacy for the presidency. Heavily dependent for political contributions on the Wall Street crowd that is funding much of the so-called education reform movement, I said then that both the NEA and AFT ought to start making it clear to her that “…she will have to stake out positions aimed at ending the tyranny of high stakes testing, stopping the public funding of corporately run charter schools, promoting teaching and education over training, correcting the serious flaws in the Common Core State Standards and addressing in meaningful ways the scourge of child poverty that afflicts so many of the nation’s children, robbing them of a chance at a decent life.”

I was pleased, therefore, to see the New York Times take the issue up today in a front page article. Hillary has a real dilemma. If she is not strong in support of public education and the people who work in our schools, union leaders like me will have serious difficulty marshaling our members to provide the boots on the ground support she is going to need. If she solidly supports public schools and teachers, she runs the very real risk of abandonment by her bankrollers, especially if Jeb Bush is the nominee of the Republicans. Bush has been a leader of the corporate attack on public education.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

I Had Few Tests and Little Homework

I had little to no homework when I went to elementary school but managed to become a reasonably literate person able to earn a decent living at work that I thoroughly enjoyed. Before my parents forced me to attend religious instruction after school, I was free to spend from 3:00 to 6:00 P.M. each day playing with friends, either in the neighborhood school yards or in a wonderful after school center in my elementary school supervised by Mr. Kraft, a fifth grade teacher at our school who kept us all in line without almost never having to even raise his voice. Our respect for him was all that was necessary to keep our mischievous natures in check.

Evenings were spent over family dinners that began each evening with listening to the 6 o’clock news on the radio. After the news, family talk occupied 45 minutes or so of leisurely eating. With television, after dinner we all moved to the living room where the one TV set was installed which we watched together, engaging in conversation all the while.

School was seen by my parents as my job to be conducted largely during school hours. Today’s elementary students do more homework than I had in high school. They spend their afternoons at lessons of one kind or another and endure enough homework that it’s a wonder how any of them come to enjoy learning, their days being so over-loaded with academic tasks. Ironically, they are pushed by their parents into a rat race to build resumes to qualify for some elite college, a frenetic piling up of organized activities that supersedes the cultivation of the interests that make a college education worthwhile.

Somehow, my teachers used our school hours together to teach me to read efficiently, to do basic mathematics, some history and science, music, arts and crafts, phys ed and an appreciation of citizenship, even teaching us Roberts Rules of Order and arranging meetings for us to participate in that required them. For a few pennies a day, from second or third grade on, we bought the New York Times or Herald Tribune, and received lesson in how to read them, even on the subway. We discussed articles from those papers every day. When President Eisenhower was inaugurated, school work stopped as we listened to his first speech as president. While there were little quizzes from time to time, I recall no instance of being drilled for any test. There were standardized tests from time to time, but I never had the sense that they were determinative of anything important to me. I don’t recall a single kid being upset by them. We never knew when they were coming, never knew what was done with the results. No big deal. Looking back, it seems to me that much of my early school experiences were designed to help us explore our world and our place in it.

Somehow without being burdened by school, without everything being organized around some examination, I managed to get educated and to acquire the skills to enter and succeed in college, going on to a tour in the Peace Corps in Ghana, a career in education with a parallel one in public sector union work. I believe I received an education far superior to the one the children in our school district are getting. Somehow, with little researched based knowledge of child development, my teachers fashioned an infinitely more appropriate learning environment than our teacher’s today are able to provide, my colleagues increasingly being forced to do things they deem inappropriate and in many cases detrimental to the children in their charge. Tests and homework were not confused with rigor, and learning was respected for its own sake and not an economic instrument.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Time to Increase the Pressure

Imagine if all of the school boards that have joined the battle against Governor Cuomo’s proposed doubling down on high stakes testing publically announced that they pledge not to implement the law if it should pass and that they will join with their teachers and cease administering the state examinations until such time as exams are created that can be used to help teachers teach. Imagine such an assertion of local control. Imagine it coupled with a pledge by NYSUT to recruit candidates for the legislature to oppose those who support the governor, whether it is in primaries or by supporting candidates who are neither Republican nor Democrats. The polls show growing support for the anti- testing movement. We need to exert even strong pressure on the pro-testing legislators.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

A Union Man’s Reason For Opting -Out

Union Brother Tom McMahon is a local union president who has elementary age children. He has movingly written publicly about the reasons he and his wife have chosen to opt their children out of the state assessments. One would have to be completely tone deaf not to appreciate the sincerity of his thoughts. Listen to the passionate voice of a teacher and father talking about the effects of high stakes testing on his two children with very different needs.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

On Asses and Seats

There’s an old Yiddish saying that translates as, “Your ass can’t sit in two places at the same time.” It is sometimes uttered in its literal meaning, and sometimes metaphorically to highlight the holding of two mutually exclusive ideas. It’s in its latter sense that it comes to mind this morning to highlight the administration of my school district and many others who some days wish to be seen as militants in the anti-testing struggle but at other times act to perpetuate the illusion that the malignant testing mandates are not drowning out serious education.

From the superintendent of schools to the lowly elementary teachers, there isn’t anyone who doesn’t know that high stakes tests are increasingly driving instruction. There also isn’t anyone without a concern for the test results. Teachers’ jobs depend on them to in part, and the superintendent and other administrators know that a poor district performance on the state assessments is difficult to explain, ironically even to those oppose to the testing regime. Teachers have been given books and materials meant to exercise kids in the kinds of questions they can expect in April. Yet, curiously and completely hypocritically, faced with growing opposition to the tests, the administration of my district ordered teachers not to send test prep material home, apparently not wanting parents to see what their children are doing in the name of education. The implication to teachers is to use the test prep material in school where parents won’t be able to observe just how much instructional time is dedicated to the tests. Everyone has an interest in good test results, objectively meaningless though they may be.

It’s the same with the district’s response to the opt-out movement. The administration knows that the growing numbers of parents who refuse to allow their children to be subjected to the state assessments is the most potent weapon that we have to end the misuse of testing. They even agreed with us last year to make opting-out a less stressful experience for children, working with us to create alternate settings for these kids so that they would not have to sit and stare as other children took the examinations. Yet, with testing season rapidly approaching, they have done nothing to apprize parents of the process for opting their children out, clearly seeking to avoid growing numbers, but, in so doing, aiding and abetting the continuation of the very testing regime they claim to abhor.

So here’s a gentle reminder Plainview-Old Bethpage administration and other like it. Your asses can’t sit in two places at the same time. If you don’t want test prep, let’s sit down and work out a plan to end our participation in the tests. Furthermore, let’s also see if we can’t agree on the developmentally inappropriate aspects of the Common Core State Standards and promulgate Plainview-Old Bethpage standards that are aligned with reasonable expectations for children and flexible enough to service the academic needs of all. Let’s all have the courage to sit with those who care about children and cease our participation with those who have no interest in public education or the children it serves but are motivated by abject avarice. That’s the comfortable place to sit.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Time Is On Our Side

It may not be a popular view, but I’m beginning to hope that there is no budget deal by April 1. If there is one, I suspect the legislature will have significantly caved to the education demands of our megalomaniacal governor. Time appears to be on the side of those opposed to Cuomo’s plans. A recent Quinnipiac University poll shows strong support for the opposition of New York State United Teachers (NYSUT) to the Governor’s plan to tie teacher evaluations even further to the high stakes test scores of their students. Overwhelmingly, the public recognizes that this is a very bad idea, so bad that it is a big factor in substantially reducing Angry Andy’s favorability numbers. Cuomo has dug himself an education policy hole that the Assembly and Senate have to slowly fill in on his head. A late budget would also allow for this year’s opt-out numbers to amplify what polls have been showing, waning support for the test an punish approach to the improvement of public education in New York. Those numbers are bound to be much higher than the 60,000 children whose parents withheld them from the state assessments last year. Let the budget process grind to a crawl, as we watch Governor Arrogance try to slither away from the tough positions he staked out.

posted by Morty in Uncategorized and have No Comments